Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 104

Thread: 2014 Rolex 24

  1. #11
    Senior Member Fogelhund's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Binbrook, ON Canuckistan
    Posts
    385
    Quote Originally Posted by Kchrpm View Post
    10 Corvettes (including DPs), 10 458 Italias, GIGGITY.
    How can you legitimately keep a straight face calling a DP a "Corvette"?

  2. #12
    Corvette Enthusiast Kchrpm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    8,709
    I can't. I just searched the word "Corvette" on that PDF. It just means "a vehicle I hope will defeat a different vehicle that doesn't say Corvette". It's incredibly shallow but it gives me a reason to care about the DPs, which I didn't have before, in addition to letting them not look like dog shit. I'm sure that was the entire point of the Corvette DP program, and, for me at least, it worked.
    Get that weak shit off my track

  3. #13
    mAdminstrator Random's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Davis, CA, USA
    Posts
    3,612


    I'm reading some grumbling around the 'net about GM not releasing a customer C7. Might help their "we're a real sportscar!" image if they did just what the Porkas do. Might not.
    Whoomah!

  4. #14
    Senior Member Fogelhund's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Binbrook, ON Canuckistan
    Posts
    385
    Quote Originally Posted by Random View Post


    I'm reading some grumbling around the 'net about GM not releasing a customer C7. Might help their "we're a real sportscar!" image if they did just what the Porkas do. Might not.
    I wonder who is grumbling... C7.R's sold to customer in Europe, pending approval to allow them to run in GTE-AM... seems they are available, to the right people.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    247
    Quote Originally Posted by Fogelhund View Post
    I wonder who is grumbling... C7.R's sold to customer in Europe, pending approval to allow them to run in GTE-AM... seems they are available, to the right people.
    How can they run in GTE-AM with a brand new car? AM needs to be a year old homologation, does it not?

  6. #16
    mAdminstrator Random's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Davis, CA, USA
    Posts
    3,612
    Quote Originally Posted by Fogelhund View Post
    I wonder who is grumbling... C7.R's sold to customer in Europe, pending approval to allow them to run in GTE-AM... seems they are available, to the right people.
    I guess they were focusing on the US market?
    Whoomah!

  7. #17
    Senior Member Fogelhund's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Binbrook, ON Canuckistan
    Posts
    385
    Quote Originally Posted by Impreza View Post
    How can they run in GTE-AM with a brand new car? AM needs to be a year old homologation, does it not?
    ..Yes, and yet....Larbre

  8. #18
    Corvette Enthusiast Kchrpm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    8,709
    GTE-Am class regulations prohibit current model year cars, although Porsche’s 911 RSR, which received significant end-of-season updates, will be allowed to race in both GTE-Pro and GTE-Am next year since the car raced in that spec in 2013.
    Translation: They put new updates on their old car, so technically it's still an old car even if it's just like the new car?
    Get that weak shit off my track

  9. #19
    Corvette Enthusiast Kchrpm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    8,709
    Am I the only one that didn't know about the new "slow zone" rules?

    http://sportscar365.com/wec/new-safe...mans-revealed/

    The French organizers revealed plans Friday for a new “slow zone” procedure, where only one section of the 8.5-mile circuit would be put under caution. However, unlike local yellows, cars would be not be allowed to exceed 60 kph in the designated zone.
    Get that weak shit off my track

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    247
    Quote Originally Posted by Fogelhund View Post
    ..Yes, and yet....Larbre
    Lots of "if"s and "could"s in that article.

    Were the ACO to allow that it'd open a massive can of worms for everyone else in AM running year old homologations.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •