Re Mario's bump fire video, that guy completely misses the point. The shooter wasn't going for pinpoint accuracy of a single target, he wanted to spray as many bullets as possible at a large crowd of people. And as that guy inadvertantly proved, that's really the only point of a bump stock, and there's no real legal reason for it otherwise.
Either way, banning them makes sense, but also won't make a dent of a difference on gun related deaths as a whole.
There's a bi-partisan push to ban them already, and even the NRA says they need "regulation". Notice they said regulation, not banning. Fuck the NRA.
Also, if any of you try to explain how fire is different than a gun, I'm going to set this place on fire.
Fire initiates a chemical change in many substances, whereas a gun does so in none.
What about as part of the decomposition of formerly living cells?Originally Posted by thesameguy
Is there a law that defies what right to bear arms exactly means and could it be set to 18th century firearms?
Would muskets, cannons and catapults being legal satisfy everyone all the time?
Oh no! he stays on point til the end.
acket.
I think all weapons should be outlawed....except catapults and trebuchets
Fuck this country.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
