I think when it's a law regarding a tool designed to kill, it should be important enough for a nationwide law. IMO, of course.
I think when it's a law regarding a tool designed to kill, it should be important enough for a nationwide law. IMO, of course.
Our elected officials are too worried about not getting re-elected if they voted for such legislation.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Make all the guns pink with flowers on them and they won't be half as popular.
It is, but there really isn't a good solution. It's a lot of land and a lot of very different people. Comparing America against *most* of the developed world is pretty rough - we have a lot more going on. Throwing everything we have under one roof might be just as ineffective as 50 little ones. Reading car forums like I do I am blown away by the sheer outrage folks in Michigan have over the wacko stuff we Californians do, etc. I think it's entirely possible one of the reasons we've all been able to stick together is the solace afforded to "locals" being able to band together under the roof of statehood and feel that they aren't being affected by nutjobs 1000 miles away. I don't think applying the template of Europe, Japan, or Australia is really all that useful. In composition, we're more like the EU than any discrete European nation. And we don't get along internally any better than they do, for the same reasons.
Background Check Flaw Let Dylann Roof Buy Gun, F.B.I. Says
WASHINGTON — The man accused of killing nine people in a historically black church in South Carolina last month should not have been able to buy the gun he used in the attack, the F.B.I. said Friday, in what was the latest acknowledgment of flaws in the national background check system.
A loophole in the system and an error by the F.B.I. allowed the man, Dylann Roof, to buy the .45-caliber handgun despite having previously admitted to drug possession, officials said.
And there you have it. More laws don't make it better. We need better screening.