Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Fact vs Fiction: 50/50 Weight distribution is "ideal"

  1. #21
    Corvette Enthusiast Kchrpm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    8,709
    It almost kind of sort of sounds familiar, like I might have known and then forgot. Still, I feel insufficiently knowledgeable.
    Get that weak shit off my track

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    316
    I think Bryan kinda upstaged me when he started driving in the series too

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    2,294
    From an agility point of view it's important to realize that a turning car doesn't rotate about its centre, its biased to the rear. Although some 4 wheel steering systems do try to move that point forward (but they don't turn the rears as much as the fronts)
    So in terms of moment of inertia for rotating the car, a rear bias is preferred.
    I got asked about this in a job interview! For a software job! By a guy who later helped found Tesla.

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    12,845
    I suppose that's the main reason why f1 indycars and pretty much all modern super cars moved their engines behind the driver now...

    Slight rear weight bias is helpful during hard acceleration with the 2 rear wheels, good for turning(as noted by DN), and distribute the weight to all 4 wheels better under braking...

    That's probably as ideal as it gets...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •