I came across an interesting argument against those who claim their god is omniscient and omnipotent the other day. In the spirit of discussion I'm curious to see how it could be tackled. I imagine a devout monotheist would have to use free will to argue against it, but I would still say "perhaps, but couldn't he have done better?". Here's how it goes (in my words):
1. If a god is omnipotent, he is capable of doing some given thing
2. If a god is omniscient he will also know how to do the things he's capable of
Therefore, if an omnipotent, omniscient god decides to do something, it will happen.
So, if a god wanted to effectively communicate his message to us it would happen, yet there are several different monotheistic religions (whose devotees will often claim their god is omnipotent and omniscient) and those religions are further divided into countless sects with different doctrine based on different interpretations of what they believe to be their message from god.
What gives?