If it's a lie, politifact needs to weed it out rather than using it.
Also, you can't just reject the entire politifact article simply because of that one source.
I quoted their article, without any of Billi's commentary to show you why Benghazi was different and all you have to argue against that with is you don't like a particular source...
Fine, lets ignore that source, Benghazi incident was still different from the other attacks, right?
Fact based argument, remember?
Is it fact we haven't lost an ambassador since the 70s?
Also, you really thought our government's responses to the attack and to the public afterwards were as good as it gets? Given our money and Intel limitations? Can you please try to leave partisan politics out and focus only on facts?
Last edited by Crazed_Insanity; May 30th, 2017 at 08:34 AM.
Currently happening on Twitter:
SnowflakePrincess @amandablount2 5h5 hours ago
I'm tracking *45's number right now. He is growing by around 100 bots a minute. He is massing a propaganda army.
JΞSŦΞR ✪ ΔCŦUΔL³³º¹ @th3j35t3r 9h9 hours ago
@realDonaldTrump << account has gained over 5 million followers in less than 3 days. Mostly bots. He's getting ready for something.
Tea Pain @TeaPainUSA 33m33 minutes ago
Tea smells a Russia-bot "Denial of Content" attack comin'. They will flood Twitter with propaganda so that negative Trump news is diluted.
Sure, why not!?
Last edited by Crazed_Insanity; May 31st, 2017 at 07:29 PM.
Oh shit. Aren't you the one who refused to answer a basic question for what, ... months? Fuck off.
Benghazi was a random attack implemented by rabble rousers in a crowd of angry people. If it was planned (typical embassy attacks) there would have been a bomb used; see almost every other embassy attack.
I'm sure most of my responses seemed unacceptable to you, but I believe I've always responded. If anything took months, it's probably only because I missed it?
Anyway, I don't think we'll be able to find or google up facts about terrorists. We also don't have access to intel from CIA or whatever... so there's really no point to argue whether if that was planned or not. That was also not the point of contention. Security funding cuts is bad for any sort of attacks, planned or not.Benghazi was a random attack implemented by rabble rousers in a crowd of angry people. If it was planned (typical embassy attacks) there would have been a bomb used; see almost every other embassy attack.
I was mostly interested in knowing your response to this following question from my earlier post:
Also, you really thought our government's responses to the attack and to the public afterwards were as good as it gets? Given our money and Intel limitations? Can you please try to leave partisan politics out and focus only on facts?